. *
  • Contact
  • Legal Pages
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Cookie Privacy Policy
    • DMCA
    • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Friday, May 9, 2025
No Result
View All Result
JPC News
  • Ecology
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • People
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • World
  • Ecology
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • People
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • World
No Result
View All Result
JPC News
No Result
View All Result
Home Science

National Academies Abandon Efforts to Combine Indigenous Knowledge with Modern Science: What Went Wrong?

by Jean-Pierre CHALLOT
July 28, 2024
in Science
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

Table of Contents

    • 0.1 – What are the challenges of integrating indigenous knowledge with modern science?
  • 1 What Went ‌Wrong: National Academies Abandon Efforts to ​Combine Indigenous Knowledge with Modern Science
    • 1.1 Background
    • 1.2 Challenges Faced
      • 1.2.1 Lack of Understanding and Respect for Indigenous Knowledge
      • 1.2.2 Power Imbalances
      • 1.2.3 Communication ‌and Collaboration
      • 1.2.4 Lack‌ of Institutional‍ Support and ⁤Funding
    • 1.3 Implications
      • 1.3.1 Loss of Valuable Knowledge and Insights
      • 1.3.2 Continued Marginalization
      • 1.3.3 Missed Opportunities for Sustainable Development ‍and Environmental Conservation
      • 1.3.4 Underrepresentation of Diverse Perspectives
    • 1.4 Moving Forward
      • 1.4.1 Increasing Awareness and Recognition
      • 1.4.2 Fostering Genuine Partnerships and Collaboration
      • 1.4.3 Providing ‍Institutional Support⁤ and Funding
      • 1.4.4 Building Capacity Within Scientific ​Institutions
    • 1.5 Conclusion

– What are the challenges of integrating indigenous knowledge with modern science?

Why‌ National Academies Abandoned⁢ Efforts to Combine Indigenous Knowledge with Modern‌ Science

Learn about the ‌reasons behind the abandonment ​of efforts to combine indigenous ⁤knowledge with modern science. Explore what went wrong and how we can move forward in a more inclusive way.

What Went ‌Wrong: National Academies Abandon Efforts to ​Combine Indigenous Knowledge with Modern Science

In recent years, there has been a growing ‌recognition of the need to integrate indigenous knowledge with modern science. Indigenous knowledge, which is the knowledge, innovations, and practices of indigenous peoples, has been proven to provide valuable insights into⁣ various areas such as ⁤environmental conservation,‌ sustainable development, and traditional medicine. However, despite the potential benefits of ‌combining indigenous knowledge with modern science, efforts to do so have faced numerous challenges.

Background

The National Academies, which include the National Academy ‌of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the National Academy of Medicine,⁤ have long been at the ⁢forefront of efforts to bridge the ‌gap between indigenous ‍knowledge and modern science. These institutions have recognized the importance of incorporating diverse⁢ perspectives and knowledge systems into scientific research and policy-making processes.

Challenges Faced

Despite the good intentions, the efforts to combine indigenous knowledge with modern science have encountered ‌several challenges, including:

  • Lack of understanding and respect for indigenous knowledge
  • Power imbalances between indigenous communities and scientific ⁤institutions
  • Difficulties in communication and collaboration
  • Lack of institutional support and funding for integration efforts

Lack of Understanding and Respect for Indigenous Knowledge

One of the main challenges has been the lack of understanding and respect ​for ‌indigenous knowledge within scientific institutions. Traditional​ scientific paradigms often prioritize Western scientific methods and overlook the⁣ rich knowledge systems ​of indigenous cultures. This has led to the marginalization and exclusion of indigenous knowledge ⁤from⁤ mainstream scientific discourse.

Power Imbalances

The ⁢power imbalances between indigenous communities and scientific institutions⁣ have also⁣ posed significant challenges. Indigenous peoples have historically been disenfranchised and marginalized, leading to unequal power‌ dynamics in research and policy-making processes. This has made it difficult for indigenous knowledge to be valued and integrated⁣ on an equal footing with modern science.

Communication ‌and Collaboration

Communication and collaboration between indigenous‌ communities ⁣and scientific institutions have often ⁤been fraught with challenges. Language barriers, cultural differences, and differing worldviews have made it difficult to ​establish⁣ meaningful partnerships and engage in productive dialogue. As a result, many efforts to combine indigenous knowledge with modern science⁢ have stalled or‍ been ineffective.

Lack‌ of Institutional‍ Support and ⁤Funding

Furthermore, the⁣ lack of institutional support and funding ⁣for integration efforts has hindered progress in this area. Scientific institutions and ​funding agencies have not ‌always prioritized the integration of indigenous knowledge, leading ⁢to limited resources and support‍ for initiatives that‌ seek to combine indigenous knowledge with modern⁤ science.

Implications

The challenges faced in efforts to combine indigenous knowledge with modern science have significant implications for research, policy-making, and the well-being of indigenous ‍communities. These ​implications include:

  • Loss of valuable knowledge and insights
  • Continued marginalization of indigenous communities
  • Missed opportunities for sustainable ‌development and environmental conservation
  • Underrepresentation of diverse perspectives in scientific research

Loss of Valuable Knowledge and Insights

By marginalizing indigenous knowledge, ​we risk losing valuable knowledge ‌and insights that could contribute to addressing pressing global challenges such as climate change, ‍biodiversity loss, and public health crises. Indigenous knowledge has been accumulated over generations and offers​ unique perspectives and solutions​ to complex problems.

Continued Marginalization

The exclusion of indigenous knowledge from scientific discourse perpetuates the marginalization of indigenous ​communities. It reinforces unequal power dynamics and denies ​indigenous peoples the opportunity to⁢ have their voices heard and their knowledge appreciated and respected.

Missed Opportunities for Sustainable Development ‍and Environmental Conservation

Integrating indigenous knowledge with modern science holds great potential for advancing sustainable development ​and environmental conservation efforts. Indigenous peoples have a⁣ deep understanding of the natural world and have ​developed sustainable practices that can inform and enhance modern scientific approaches​ to⁤ environmental stewardship.

Underrepresentation of Diverse Perspectives

Without‍ the integration of indigenous knowledge, scientific research and policy-making processes continue to be limited by​ an underrepresentation of diverse perspectives. ​Embracing diverse knowledge systems and‍ worldviews is essential ‍for addressing ​complex and multifaceted challenges facing⁣ society.

Moving Forward

While the challenges in combining indigenous knowledge with modern science are significant, there are steps that​ can be⁢ taken to ‍move⁣ forward in a more inclusive and equitable way. These steps include:

  • Increasing awareness and recognition of indigenous knowledge
  • Fostering genuine partnerships and collaboration
  • Providing institutional support ‌and funding for integration ​efforts
  • Building⁤ capacity within scientific institutions to engage ‌with indigenous knowledge

Increasing Awareness and Recognition

It is crucial to increase awareness and recognition ​of the value of indigenous knowledge⁣ within scientific​ institutions and ⁢society as a ‌whole. This ‍includes acknowledging the contributions of indigenous knowledge to our understanding of⁣ the natural world and recognizing its potential to​ inform and enrich modern scientific endeavors.

Fostering Genuine Partnerships and Collaboration

Genuine partnerships and collaboration between indigenous communities and scientific institutions are‌ essential for successfully combining indigenous knowledge with modern science. This requires mutual⁢ respect, ​trust, and‌ a commitment to ​meaningful engagement that values the unique perspectives ‍and contributions of indigenous peoples.

Providing ‍Institutional Support⁤ and Funding

Scientific​ institutions and funding agencies must prioritize the integration of indigenous knowledge and provide the necessary support and funding for integration efforts. This includes creating dedicated‌ funding ⁤streams for research that combines indigenous knowledge with⁢ modern science and⁤ establishing institutional mechanisms to support such initiatives.

Building Capacity Within Scientific ​Institutions

Scientific institutions ‍need to build their capacity to engage with indigenous knowledge in a meaningful and respectful way. This includes investing​ in training and education for researchers, establishing guidelines and principles for integrating indigenous knowledge, and creating‌ spaces for indigenous voices to⁤ be heard within scientific ‍institutions.

Conclusion

The abandonment of ​efforts to combine indigenous knowledge with modern science by the National Academies highlights the challenges and implications of overlooking indigenous knowledge in scientific research and policy-making. In order ​to move‌ forward in a more inclusive and equitable way, it is essential to recognize‍ the value‌ of indigenous knowledge, foster genuine partnerships and collaboration, provide​ institutional support and funding, and build‍ capacity within scientific institutions. By embracing diverse knowledge systems and worldviews, we can work towards addressing complex challenges and advancing sustainable, just, and inclusive development.

Last October, I wrote‍ a review of the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) new initiative, known as an attempt to blend ⁣indigenous knowledge with modern science, which took place in ⁣the United ⁢States with a budget of $30 million. ⁣The NSF was very optimistic about this endeavor, but ⁢my concern at the time was that the project ‍aimed to unite indigenous and modern knowledge ⁣with the objective of promoting ‍equity⁢ among researchers. In ‌my opinion, ⁤there⁣ should be a focus on using funds to train indigenous youth in STEM subjects, fostering equal opportunities for them to‍ pursue science ⁤careers and ensuring that there is ⁢no prejudice against them. I believe that investing in education rather than cultures ‌would be‌ a ‍more effective approach ⁤as it would lead to long-lasting and self-sustaining outcomes.

Unbeknownst to me, a similar ⁢project, referred to as​ “braiding”, was being attempted by ​another ⁣funding group, the U.S. ⁤National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), with a significantly lower funding allocation of $2 million. Despite my unfamiliarity with the NSF project’s outcome, the⁢ NASEM’s effort turned out to be short-lived due to several reasons.

The initial purpose of the project, led by NASEM, was to explore coproduction, the process of ⁣jointly creating and sharing knowledge between scientists, ⁢Indigenous community members, and other scientific stakeholders in a way that acknowledges diverse perspectives. It‌ was disclosed that the ‍study wasn’t ⁣intended to ​be coproduced, despite the panel’s initial desire to use this concept. Eventually, internal differences led‍ to‌ the collapse of ‌the project. Notably, the ⁢study faced criticism for being ‍exclusive and not allowing equitable participation by indigenous partners, prompting a call for the project to‌ be “paused” to address the issues and involve ‌indigenous ​people more effectively.

The project also faced challenges⁢ due to a controversy over the⁤ choice of venue for a second ⁤workshop, as NASEM leaders deemed the‌ venue inappropriate. The tensions eventually led to the‍ disbandment of the entire project by NASEM and the ⁤expulsion ‍of some committee members, ultimately resulting in a significant failure.

I believe ⁢that the ‍failure of these‌ projects is due ‍to⁢ the⁢ inherent⁣ differences between indigenous and modern scientific knowledge. While indigenous knowledge‌ is valuable, ⁤practical, and based on localized experiences, it does not encompass the extensive empirical knowledge found in the fields of modern‌ science. I also assert that the discussions surrounding these projects reflect an ⁣attempt to address power dynamics, often resulting in conflicts over whose voices are heard. It is clear that indigenous knowledge cannot be⁢ considered equal in prominence⁤ or importance to modern science and attempting to force this equality creates challenges. Therefore, I⁣ believe it is necessary to have an open discussion about the role of indigenous science versus modern science in addressing global ⁢challenges like climate change and infectious disease outbreaks.

H/t⁣ Jon

Tags: abandonedAcademiesAttemptbraidCollaborationcollapsesCultural AppropriationCultural RespectevolutionindigenousIndigenous KnowledgeIndigenous PeoplesknowledgeKnowledge IntegrationMistakesmodernModern ScienceNationalNational AcademiesresearchscienceTrue
ShareTweetPin
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Discover the Hidden Dangers of the ‘Trad Wife’ Lifestyle

Next Post

Unveiling the influential Peter Thiel tech network behind JD Vance’s success

Jean-Pierre CHALLOT

With a solid foundation in the field of visual arts, gained notably in the entertainment, political, fashion, and advertising industries, Jean-Pierre Challot is an accomplished photographer and filmmaker. After spending over five years traveling all around the world, but mainly in Asia and Africa, he broadened his perspective and cultural understanding. A passionate educator, he shared his knowledge for several years before fully dedicating himself to digital content creation. Today, he is a leading figure in the blogging world, with several successful websites such as asia-news.biz, info-blog.org, capital-cities.info, usa-news.biz, jpc.news, ...

Related Posts

What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times
Science

Seacoast Sips of Science serves up a pint of knowledge: Nature News – Seacoastonline.com

April 3, 2025
Greenwich students win science awards, police department welcomes new officer and other celebrations – Greenwich Time
Science

Greenwich students win science awards, police department welcomes new officer and other celebrations – Greenwich Time

April 1, 2025
Opinion – Nick Joy asks: Is this the end of science? – Fish Farmer Magazine
Science

Opinion – Nick Joy asks: Is this the end of science? – Fish Farmer Magazine

March 31, 2025
What causes a solar eclipse? The science behind it – The Times of India
Science

What causes a solar eclipse? The science behind it – The Times of India

March 29, 2025

Recommended

What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times

Here’s what happens to the body when you reduce sitting time by 40 minutes per day – The Indian Express

1 month ago
What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times

Israeli attacks kill, injure at least 100 children a day in Gaza: UN – Al Jazeera

1 month ago
What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times

WVU Sport Sciences and WVU Baseball partnership combines research, technology and performance – My Buckhannon

1 month ago
What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times

Trump’s tariffs put India and its struggling economy at a crossroads – The Washington Post

1 month ago
What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times

Can Team USA translate world championship medals to bobsleigh, skeleton and luge success at Milano Cortina 2026? – Olympics.com

1 month ago
What Will Elon Musk Learn From the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election? – The New York Times

Justin Ritzel on high school sports, injuries, and why these stories matter – Democrat and Chronicle

1 month ago

Categories

Archives

July 2024
MTWTFSS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 
« Jun   Aug »

Tags

biodiversity (65) celebrity news (70) China (59) Climate Change (87) Conservation (76) ecology (434) economy (235) education (52) entertainment (247) environmental impact (44) Environmental science (42) Football (56) health (282) healthcare (59) Innovation (99) JeanPierreChallot (1347) JPCnews (1347) July (51) Latest (87) lifestyle (447) Lifestyle Changes (43) Live (121) Mental Health (65) Nature (42) News (208) people (418) politics (267) post.. (114) Public Health (52) research (56) science (241) social media (77) Social media addiction (43) sports (274) Sustainability (105) technology (281) times (139) Today (119) Trump (119) Updates (101) USA (47) Washington (130) Wellness (94) world (243) York (75)
  • Contact
  • Legal Pages

© 2024 todaynewsgazette.com.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Technology
  • Health

© 2024 todaynewsgazette.com.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Technology
  • Health

© 2024 todaynewsgazette.com.

Go to mobile version